Why negative results are usually not published
March 11th, 2009
Why negative results are usually not published Cameron comes up with several persuasive reasons in Why good intentions are not enough to get negative results published: The idea is that there is a huge backlog of papers detailing negative results that people are gagging to get out if only there was somewhere to publish them. Unfortunately there … Read the full post from A Blog Around The Clock Tags: open science via Blogdigger blog search for web hosting .
Go here to read the rest:
Why negative results are usually not published